Lumad communities displaced after bomber threat

By Beatriz Zamora


Nine Lumad communities were forced to flee from their homes in Lianga, Surigao del Sur after the threat of a surveying bomber plane atop mountain communities in the area, Wednesday night.


At least 2,000 individuals were displaced, 633 of which were Lumad students affected with the suspension of classes in the Alternative Learning Center for Agricultural and Livelihood Development (ALCADEV).


Military operations have been underway in Lianga since Monday. Checkpoints have also been established in the area since the President Rodrigo Duterte’s declaration of Martial Law last May 23.


With this policy, residents and visitors are required to prove their identity to the authorities.


Along with 17 other communities, the nine displaced groups have also been forced to evacuate last 2015 after paramilitary men killed Lumad leader Dionel Campos and ALCADEV executive director Emerito Samarca.


The Lumad evacuees are currently at the Simowao Tribal Community School, nine kilometers from the national highway in Surigao del Sur.

Students slam free higher education bill anew, continue to fight for tuition-free PH

Text and Photo by Nacho Domingo

Students from local universities gathered a second time at the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) to call for the implementation of free education on a national scale on May 23.

After mobilizing on May 10 with the same call, the students also protested against the approval of the Universal Access to Quality Tertiary Education Act of 2017, which acts as a financial assistance program for State Universities and Colleges (SUCs) nationwide.

“We can see that bills such as this one try to make it seem like the government is for free education even though this only helps legitimize the commercialization of our education,” said Misty Pegram of Anakbayan Media Collective.

The Universal Access to Quality Tertiary Education Act, also known as HB 5663, consolidates House Bill 2771 filed by Albay Rep. Joey S. Salceda, which was first filed in June 2016. The bill offers a 15-billion peso subsidy for tertiary education to be used on tuition and other expenses.

However, according to Kabataan Party-list representative Sarah Jane Elago, the socialization of tuition may be implemented in the SUCs in the Philippines. This means that tuition fees will still be collected, and will be scaled according to the financial income of each student’s household.

According to the protesters, the passage of this bill deviates from President Rodrigo Duterte’s promise of free education for the year 2017

“Once ma-implement yung HB 5633, kailangan mong patunayan ang pagiging mahirap mo [para makakamit ng libreng edukasyon]. Sisingil pa ng other school fees,” said incoming University of the Philippines Diliman University Student Council Councilor Brian Black.

It can be recalled that the president said earlier this year that free education will only be granted to “poor but academically capable students.”

“It’s one of our basic rights, and you shouldn’t have to worry about having to pay or not when you enroll,” said Pegram.

The students advocated not only the removal of tuition at all levels of education, but the junking of other school fees as well, which again were implemented in the first academic semester of 2017.

The student leaders present at the mobilization were eventually allowed to dialogue with CHED representatives inside the headquarter premises, where their contentions regarding free education were addressed. However, the content of the dialogue was not made public by government institution.

CHED is yet to publicly address the student mobilizations, and has revealed no plans of altering the Universal Access to Quality Tertiary Education act of 2017.  #

UP caps off Season 79 with street dance podium finish

Text by Luisa Morales

Photo by Antonne Santiago


It was an electrifying performance, a fitting end for an electrifying season.

The University of the Philippines Streetdance Club (UP SDC) ends Season 79 of the UAAP with a bang, finishing first-runner up behind the De La Salle University Dance Company – Street (LSDC – Street) during the UAAP Street Dance Competition at the University of Santo Tomas (UST) Plaza Mayor, Saturday.

University of the East (UE) opened the program clad in their red letterman jackets. The UE crew energized the crowd, setting the standards for the rest of the competition.

The Adamson University CAST matched their followed suit with their summer-themed routine.

Looking to defend home turf, UST Prime took the stage. The UAAP Season 79 hosts awed the crowd as they danced with confidence and swag.

Going into the competition as three-time champions, UP SDC had a lot on their backs. When it was their time to light up the stage, State U did not disappoint.

Clad in golden jackets, UP SDC enthralled the crowd with a Bruno Mars-inspired routine.

UP’s Katipunan neighbors, the Ateneo de Manila Company of Ateneo Dancers performed right after, followed by the Far Eastern University Dance Company, which sported a safari explorer look.

However, it was the LSDC-Street who capped off the competition with a routine worthy of the championship, garnering a score of 89.

In its attempt to compete a four-peat, State U failed, falling short against LSDC-Street by .25. Meanwhile, season hosts UST Prime won second runner-up with 85.

“‘Di naman talaga namin goal yung 4-peat or yung championship, we just want to share whatever we have [and] the fun that we have with dancing,” UP SDC captain Rap Oronce said.

The street dance competition served as the culminating event for UAAP Season 79. The closing ceremonies followed suit after the announcement of winners.

Season hosts UST bagged both general championships in the seniors and juniors division.

On the other hand, UP settled in fourth place overall with successful title runs in women’s badminton and women’s swimming.

With Season 79 officially over, all eyes are set on UAAP Season 80 hosts FEU. #


CHED exec seeks revision of CHED-DBM memo following protests, criticisms

Text and photo by Merryll Red Phae Carao

Following the May 10 protests against the Joint Memorandum by the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) and the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) on the  P8.3 billion budget for state universities and colleges (SUCs), CHED Commissioner Prospero de Vera called for a meeting to revise the guidelines for the said budget.

The CHED-DBM joint memorandum released April 20 listed implementing rules and regulations (IRR) as guidelines concerning the P8.3 billion budget allocated by the Congress for SUCs as of Dec. 15 of last year.

According to the IRR, students will be prioritized based on socio-economic status and academic excellence to avail of free tuition.

In a statement published by the University of the Philippines – Diliman (UPD) College of Science Student Council on their Facebook page, the Council said “such additional and unnecessary procedures to avail of free tuition go against the very nature of education as a right which should be provided to all without prejudice and restraint. This hindrance only perpetuates the notion that those who can pay should.”

On March 13, the Senate passed on the third and final reading the Affordable Higher Education for All Act which aims to institutionalize a tuition-free policy in SUCs.

Senate Bill 1304 was passed with 18 affirmative votes. Under the bill spearheaded by Senator Bam Aquino, CHED is mandated to facilitate the distribution of funds and to resolve issues regarding the eligibility or disqualification of students from the full tuition subsidy.

Meanwhile, another bill, House Bill 4800 or the Comprehensive Free Public Higher Education Act, filed by  Representative Sarah Elago of Kabataan Partylist, seeks to implement a free tuition scheme in all SUCs and local universities and colleges (LUCs), which include the abolition of other school fees.

This bill seeks to impose the “no-collection” policy on SUCs and LUCs in order to prohibit tuition and other fee collections.

Recent protests against the CHED-DBM memorandum reflected contentions against the Affordable Higher Education for All Act, , with youth groups labelling both efforts as “free tuition scam.”

Free Tuition Scam

Youth groups and students from various state and private universities marched to the doorsteps of CHED, Wednesday, to denounce the CHED-DBM memorandum, calling it a ‘sham’ free tuition policy and an instrument to increase the profits of SUCs.

The protest action was part of  nationwide decentralized mobilizations calling for a legitimate free tuition policy.

College Editors Guild of the Philippines (CEGP) Secretary General Daryl Angelo Baybado described CHED-DBM memorandum as a “blow against the Filipino youth.”

“It is an initial victory for the youth to have Php 8.3 billion of the national budget allocated for free higher education,” Baybado said in a press release distributed during the protest.

“However, the government was quick to seize this by releasing the implementing guidelines that greatly limit students’ access to free tuition,” he added.

On the other hand, according to progressive youth group Anakbayan, the P 8.3 billion budget is more than enough to abolish tuition fees in SUCs.

“Nakabatay ang pondong P 8 bilyon sa tinatayang kita ng lahat ng SUCs mula sa pangongolekta ng matrikula,” the group said in a press release given out during the mobilization.

“Malinaw na sapat ito upang direktang magbenepisyo ang lahat ng estudyante ng SUCs na aabot higit isang milyong kabataan sa libreng matrikula.”

Meanwhile, based on the provisions in the CHED-DBM memorandum, the IRR reveals the policy’s profiteering scheme which may give SUCs the power to hike other school fees to circumvent possible losses, said Elago.

Youth from Pandi, Bulacan also joined the protest at CHED. Most of them were high school students who dropped out of school because they cannot pay for tuition while some of them were supposedly college students who cannot get into universities because of unaffordable fees.

“Imbis na ang iuna ay ang interes ng mga politiko at mga kapitalista, dapat unahin ang interes ng mga kabataan, lalo na ang interes ng mga kabataan mula sa Pandi, kasi practically malaki talaga magiging tulong nito, lalo na kung ‘di na iisipin ng mga magulang nila na magbabayad pa sila sa kolehiyo,” said Levi Ibanez of Anakbayan Pandi.

Revising guidelines

On the night of the protest, Elago posted an update regarding the CHED-DBM guidelines, citing CHED Commissioner Prospero de Vera’s announcement during the House Committee on Appropriations meeting.

According to Elago, the guidelines will be revised to implement the provision that “no tuition shall be collected from all undergraduate students for school year 2017 to 2018.”

In an interview with the Philippine Star, de Vera said that the revision was to “simplify” the guidelines to make their implementation easier, adding that CHED has noted the concerns of various groups. The revised guidelines are expected to be released before classes start next month.

As of press time, both CHED and Commissioner de Vera have yet to respond to questions regarding the guideline revision.

Student groups saw this decision as a victory of their collective protests.

League of Filipino Students – UPD College of Social Sciences and Philosophy Chairperson Renz Pasigpasigan said the answer to free education is not in CHED but in the militant mobilization of the studentry to demand the government for their rights.

“Pagpapakita lamang ito ng lakas ng sama-samang pagkilos ng mga estudyante dahil naitulak muli natin ang CHED na tumugon sa tunay na implementasyon ng libreng edukasyon,” said Pasigpasigan.

Meanwhile, UP Diliman University Student Council Councilor Ben Te believes that the revision may actually be in favor of the students. He also urged the studentry to fight for the abolition of other school fees.

“Maaaring maging pabor sa mga estudyante ang desisyon na ito kung magpapatuloy at lalakas pa ang mga kilos-protesta ng mga estudyante sa buong bansa,” said Te.

“Dito lang natin matitiyak na matutulak natin ang administrasyong Duterte na tuluyan nang ipatupad ang libreng tuition para sa lahat,” he added.


Abot-kamay, lagpas sa larawan

ni Andrea Jobelle Adan

Aspalto at mga latag na tagpi-tagping tarpaulin, ilang mahabang tarapal na pilit pinatayo gamit kahoy, at mangilan-ngilang tent–iyan lamang ang kanlungan at panangga ng mga miyembro ng maralitang lungsod mula sa Bulacan at iba pang nayon.

Dinala ng mga miyembro ng Kalipunan ng Damayang Mahihirap (KADAMAY), isang maralitang organisasyong naipagwagi ang demanda sa libreng pabahay sa Bulacan, at ng iba pang maralita ang dalawang araw ng kanilang buhay sa kahabaan ng Agham road.

Sa kalsadang ito, nagawa nilang makapagluto, makatulog at gumising para sa panibagong araw at pagkakataon lumaban.

Sa kalsada ring ito nagtapos ang milya-milyang martsa na umabot ng apat na oras, marating lang kanilang pagdadausan ng ilang programa at panawagan, mailapit lang sa mga taong duda sa kanilang kalagayan.

Hindi ito litrato sa Facebook.

Hindi ito maiikling segment sa balita o video.

Hindi ito batuhan ng sagot sa comments section.

Lahat ito ay nangyari nang harap-harapan noong Abril 29, 30 at natapos sa isang sa lumipas na Araw ng mga Manggagawa.

Lahat ito upang maiparinig sa mamamayang Pilipino at kinauukulan na narito sila, handang idepensa ang kanilang karapatan sa pabahay, ang kanilang karapatan sa buhay.

Ang problema diba alam naman natin na ang gobyerno, hindi naman tayo pinapansin dahil kung ikaw ay walang pera, alam mo na–talagang hindi tayo didinggin,” sabi ni Lea Marali, provincial president ng Kadamay.

“Sa kanila rin ay nagtulak na iyong kahirapan talaga,” dagdag ni Marali, isa sa mga tagapuno at isa sa maraming ina.

Tulad ni Marali, kinailangang pansamantalang lisanin ng iba ang piling ng mga anak, kapamilya, at mahal sa buhay upang makalapit sa kabisera.

Sa katunayan, ang unang araw ng kanilang Lakbayan ay ang ikatlong kaarawan ng kanyang lalaking anak.

Hindi man nakagkaroon ng selebrasyon ang bata, may kalungkutan pa ring ibinahagi ni Marali na hindi niya kapiling ang anak sa mahalagang araw.

Ayon sa kanya, pinapaalalahanan ng mga lider ang kanilang mga miyembro na kung maaari ay huwag na magsama ng bata, may sakit, at nakatatanda, para sa sarili nilang kaligtasan.

Ganunpaman, matatanaw pa rin sa kanilang hanay ang ilang mga matang sabik, wala pang isang dekadang nasisilayan ang mundo at mga kamay na dekadekada na kumakayod makaraos lang ang sa araw-araw.

Sa dagat ng mga nakataas na kamao, mayroong naguhit na sa mga nagbubukulang ugat ang masalimuot na kalahating daang taon, at mayroong mumunting kamay na hindi pa mabitawan ng mga magulang.


(Kuha ni Andrea Jobelle Adan)


Wala sa edad ang pakikiisa

Ayon kay Marali, nais rin makiisa sa laban ng kanyang anak na lalaki sa high school.

“Nag-aaral sila. Pinagtiyatiyagaang pag-aralin kahit na pumapasok sila, nakakaraos sila sa sampung piso lang na baon,” ani ni Marali.

Sa paggawa raw ng school project nadadama ng anak ang kagipitan ng pamilya. Paliwanag ni Marali, hindi pa rin sapat ang kita ng asawa bilang merchandiser sa isang kilalang mall.

Paano pa kaya sa pagpasok ng kolehiyo, ani ni Marali.

Isang mapagpanggap na libreng edukasyong pangkolehiyo raw lamang ang ibinabandera ngayon. At para sa kanilang gipit, walang lebel ng pagpapanggap ang makapagtatago ng tambak na bayarin para sa karapatan sa edukasyon.


Ipinasa ng Kongreso noong Marso ang Affordable Higher Education for All Act. Nilalayon nitong gawing libre ang tuition sa mga state-subsidized ng unibersidad at kolehiyo. Bukod sa tuition, kinakailangan pa rin magbayad ng mga estudyante ng miscellaneous fees at iba pang bayarin.

Dahil dito, pati na rin ang kagustuhan sa isang abot-kayang edukasyon, ngayon pa lamang ay nagpapahiwatig na ng pakikiisa sa kolektibong pagkilos ang kanyang supling.

Hindi rin naman raw mapipigilan ni Marali ang anak, aniya, bakas sa mukha ang parehong pag-aalala at marahang pagmamalaki.

Hamon pa nga niya sa mga estudyante ng lungsod, “Ipaglaban din ng mga kabataan ang kanilang karapatan. ‘Wag matakot.”

Tulad ni Marali naniniwala si Len Serote, maybahay ng isang bus driver, na may puwang ang kabataan sa paglaban.

Isa lamang sa kanyang mga anak ang hindi nakayanang makadalo nang sila’y nagmartsa patungo sa Mendiola nitong nakaraang Araw ng Manggagawa.

“Pag lumaki na sila, ganito rin kasi ang kanilang dadanasin sabi niya, habang tinuturuan ang bitbit na dalawang taong gulang na anak paano itaas ang kaliwang kamao. Hindi raw sapat ang sweldong nakukuha ng kanyang asawa kaya hirap silang makawala sa kahirapan.

“Kaya kailangan rin nilang matuto lumaban,” dagdag ni Serote.

Makalipas ang ilang sandali, itinaas ng sanggol ang pareho nitong mga kamay, sabay ngiti nang may pagmamalaki.

Hindi naman magkamayaw ang ilang tao at mamamahayag sa paligid; maging sila’y nahihila ng imahe ng munting mga kamaong nakataas, ng sanggol na mas mauuna pang makabisado ang linya ng masa bago ang mga kantang pambata.

Sa hindi kalayuan, naglatag na ng banig ang ilang magsasaka mula Mindanao. Nakaupo nilang sinalubong ang programang inihanda, ang kanilang mga tuhod ramdam na ang lagpas limang dekada.

Ayon kay Salvador Barsibal Jr., bise presidente ng Marbai farmers mula sa Mindanao, hindi nila itinuturing na pabigat ang kanilang edad at pangangatawan. Anim na pung taon na si Barsibal, namumuti na ang buhok, at bahagya na nakayukod ang balikat.

Para sa iba, ang anim na pung taon ay palatandaan ng pagpapahinga, ng pagtigil sa trabaho at paggamit ng naipong benepisyo. Ngunit para kay Barsibal at sa iba pang magsasaka, hindi pa sila maaaring tumigil hangga’t hindi pa inaaksyunan ang kanilang mga hinaing.

“Pursigido talaga kaming pumunta” ani niya. Kailangan raw nilang personal maipaabot sa presidente ang kalagayan nila dahil hindi naman sila pinakikinggan ng ibang sangay ng gobyerno.

“Ang kanilang suporta ay wala sa aming manggagawa, kung ‘di nasa may-ari ng malalaking lupa,” paliwanag niya.

Bakas na rin ang pagod sa boses ni Barsibal, siyang magdamag nananawagan para sa magsasaka.

Ngunit nagagawa niyang iangat at palakihin ang tinig kasama ang iba sa sabay sabay na paghiling ng hustisya.

Ito ang natitirang puhunan ni Barsibal, nina Serote at Marali, at ng lahat ng mga miyembro ng maralitang lungsod: ang sama-samang pagpapanawagan, ang sama-samang paglaban.

Paninindigan nga ni Marila, ang tagumpay ay abot-kamay lamang kung lahat ay sabay-sabay mananawagan.

Hindi ito litrato sa Facebook.

Hindi ito maikling segment sa balita o video.

Ito ang organisadong panawagan ng KADAMAY at iba pang mga maralitang tagalungsod.

UP fails to defend crown, bows out in semis

By Luisa Morales

Defending champions University of the Philippines (UP) Fighting Maroons failed to return to the finals, losing to the Far Eastern University (FEU) Tamaraws, 2-1 at the Rizal Memorial Stadium, Thursday night.

The Diliman squad started the game on the offensive, bombarding the FEU defense with powerful strikes.

But it was the Tamaraws who drew first blood.

From a corner kick, FEU took the lead courtesy of a header from Rico Andes, 1-0 at the 22nd minute mark; however, the Morayta-based club had little time to celebrate.

Less than a minute after the goal, Maroon Kintaro Miyagi scored an equalizer off the rebound after teammate JB Borlongan cut through the Tamaraw defense.

With momentum on their side, the Maroons continued on the offensive with multiple attempts to take the lead. At halftime, the game remained at deadlock, 1-all.

Come kick-off for the second half, both squads looked to take the upper hand.

At the 56th minute, FEU broke the stalemate.

Despite efforts from the Maroon defense, Andes was able to put the ball at the back of the net to give the lead back to the Morayta squad, 2-1.

Unfazed by the lead, UP continued to attack coming up with numerous attempts and almost goals, but FEU did just enough to hold the lead until the final whistle.

Despite the loss, it was still a great season for the Maroon booters who will miss the services of graduating players Ace Villanueva, Ryan Fermin, and Season 78 MVP Daniel Gadia.

UP bids goodbye to Final Four, seniors

Text by Luisa Morales

Photo by Mark Kevin Reginio

Time has come for the curtain call.

The University of the Philippines (UP) Lady Maroons close their season with a loss, bowing down to the Far Eastern University (FEU) Lady Tamaraws in three sets, 16-25, 16-25, 25-27, at the FilOil Flying V Arena in San Juan, Wednesday.

In a heartbreaking loss, the Diliman squad failed to book a final four ticket; finishing the season with a 7-7 win-loss card.

UP kept it close at the start of the match, playing at pace with the Tamaraws. By the middle of the set, State U only trailed by 2, 16-14.

However, the Lady Tamaraws gained steam coming from the technical timeout. A dominating 9-2 run at end the set gave FEU a 1-0 lead, 25-16.

It was another neck-and-neck start in the second set, both teams scoring back and forth. The Lady Tamaraws held a single point advantage over UP, 8-7.

But another huge run from the Sampaloc-based squad helped them pull away from the struggling Lady Maroons. At one point of the set, FEU was up by 10, 21-11.

Despite a late run from UP, the deficit proved too big to overcome.

FEU took a commanding 2-0 lead, 25-16.

Trailing by two sets, the Diliman squad looked out of the fight. It was a slow start for State U at the beginning of the third set, with FEU up 4-0.

But a crucial run brought UP back into the set. Scoring six straight points, the Lady Maroons held a three-point advantage by the first technical timeout, 8-5.

Eager to extend the match, the Lady Maroons battled to keep themselves alive.

FEU was at match point, 24-21 but UP wasn’t going down just yet. Late game heroics from veterans Kathy Bersola and Nicole Tiamzon powered the Maroons to extend the set.

The whole arena was on their feet with the teams tied at 25-all. But questionable calls from the officials gave FEU the match, 27-25.

The loss signaled the end of the season for the Lady Maroons. And for veterans Bersola, Tiamzon and Princess Gaiser, everything has come to an end.

The match was the culmination of the trio’s career in UP.

Despite the disappointing loss, Tiamzon remains grateful for the opportunity to play for the Lady Maroons for five consecutive years.

“Wala kaming ibang masasabi kundi thank you sa limang taon na binigay niyo rin sa’min na pagtitiwala, sa limang taon na privilege to play for UP, ” she said.

Bersola, who regrets not being a hundred percent in the 14 games they played, believes that they were able to re-establish UP as a Final Four contender team, especially after they were able to enter the Final Four last season after missing the semifinals for 12 years.

“Siguro yung pinaka legacy namin is sinubukan talaga namin ibalik yung winning ways sa UP, the former skipper said.

Gaiser, who is now recovering from a torn ACL, takes pride in the fight her teammates showed.

She kept reminding her teammates to “play with passion and pride and play because you want to.”

The final games of the elimination on Saturday will feature a battle for the top seed between the Ateneo De Manila University (ADMU) Lady Eagles and the De La Salle University (DLSU) Lady Spikers, while the University of Santo Tomas (UST) Tigresses will try to hang on to the third spot and eliminate the National University (NU) Lady Bulldogs.

BOTONG ISKO: Hot Off 2017 sparks debate on frat politics, student representation

By Krysten Mariann Boado and Dale Calanog

This year’s Student Council Elections (SCE) continues to blaze as University Student Council (USC) aspirants and College of Mass Communication Student Council (CMCSC) candidates squared off in Hot Off the Grill 2017 at the CMC Auditorium, Tuesday.

Addressing questions thrown by their would-be constituents, USC bets from KAISA – Nagkakaisang Iskolar para sa Pamantasan at Sambayanan (KAISA) and Student Alliance for the Advancement of Democratic Rights in UP (STAND UP) as well as independent councilor runners Paolo Sevilla and Carlos Cabaero gave insights on the issues such as free education, the Socialized Tuition System (STS) and student consultations with the Board of Regents, among others.

The issue of fraternity politics did not also escape public eye as KAISA standard-bearers Leandro Anton Castro and Jose Rafael Toribio, who are both members of the Upsilon Sigma Phi fraternity, were asked on how they would face and lead the student body, when their fraternity glorifies one of its brothers, former President and dictator Ferdinand Marcos, Sr.

“I don’t glorify Ferdinand Marcos; however, in our fraternity, we recognized him as our history,” Castro clarified.

STAND UP chairperson aspirant Ben Te argued against this, saying that the golden era of Martial Law is but an illusion.

“Hindi maliit na bagay ‘yung nangyari noong Batas Militar,” Te said. He added that in essence, Martial Law stepped on the rights of the Filipinos.

Te added that there should be no hesitation in condemning a dictator, especially for UP students,  who, in history opposed Martial Law and the Marcos regime.

“Siya [Marcos] po sa huli’t huli ay isang diktador. Kapag kinondena po natin ang isang diktador, kinukundena natin ito nang buong-buo, the chaiperson candidate said.  

Toribio further explained that while Upsilon recognizes Marcos as part of their fraternity’s history, its members do not discredit the atrocities he has committed during his administration.

Human rights watchdog Amnesty International has tallied 70,000 illegally arrested individuals, 34,000 torture victims as well as 3,240 slain through summary executions during the Martial Law period. The same organization also recorded 1,000 victims of enforced disappearances during the said era.

Besides countless human rights violations, the Marcos regime also brought about massive inequality, with 42 percent of the Filipino population living below the poverty line by 1980, according to data from the World Bank.

“After all, as part of the fraternity, our loyalty is with the country,” the KAISA vice chairperson hopeful said.

Marcos was not the only Upsilonian brought up during the forum as both Castro and Toribio were asked to assess their fraternity brother, former UP President Alfredo Pascual, and his six-year term as the university’s top official.

“As a brod lahat ng ating analysis in line with what is better for the students and the people,” Toribio said.

“We are clear in condemning what happen during his administration,” he added, saying that KAISA continues the call to hold Pascual accountable.

Meanwhile, his running mate, Castro, said he was able to register his dissent towards Pascual whenever he and the former UP president would run into each other.

STAND UP councilor Almira Abril spoke against this, however, saying KAISA has been missing in action when it comes to calling out Pascual.

“Dito makikita natin na ang KAISA ata, hobby nila na maging missing in action sa mga pagkilos ng mga estudyante na nagpapanawagan ng pagcall-out sa isang presidente na walang ibang ginawa kundi pahirapan ang sa estudyante,” Abril said.

The discussion among CMCSC bets was just as heated.

Assessment of the present CMCSC as well as issues of each CMC department dominated the forum, with the hopefuls addressing questions both from the audience and their fellow candidates.

With CMCSC broadcast communication representatives hailing from UP CMC Interdependent Student-centered Activism (UP CMC ISA) for the past two years, this year’s broadcast communication bets Chino Mendiola and Arlan Jondonero were asked  to determine their party’s stand on laboratory fees.

“Nailatag nila [past broadcast communication representatives] lahat ng concerns sa kanilang pakikipag-usap sa administration,” Jondonero said.

Mendiola also brought up the Rise for Education Alliance (R4E), saying that most broadcast communication constituents do not agree with the walkouts proposed by the said alliance.

R4E is an alliance of student councils and publications, youth organizations, members of the academe, parents, and the out-of-school youth from different colleges, universities, and communities, who are fighting for accessible education for all.

Its local chapter in CMC has organized different forms of protest, from free haircuts against budget cuts to dance protests for free education and human rights, aside from the regular call for walkout against lab fees and other school fees and the Socialized Tuition System (STS).

“Naniniwala po kami na bilang isang political party, fino-forward ng R4E na highest point ang mobilization,” the broadcast communication representative bet answered. “Naniniwala kami na negative ang naibibigay na message sa mga walkout.”

This was countered by opposing candidate Nickolo Domingo of STAND UP CMC, who said the R4E Alliance does not require its members to participate in the walkouts.

“Lahat tayo naniniwala sa Rise for Education Alliance, na lahat ng kaya nating iambag para sa pagpapabasura ng laboratory fees at upang maisulong ang ating karapatan sa edukasyon, ay ating gagawin, pag-walkout man ‘yan o hindi o kung ano pang mga porma na nakikita natin,” he said.

The issue of student representation was also highlighted during the debate.

With STAND UP CMC lobbying against the students’ Magna Carta, UP CMC ISA USC representative runner Mary Nicole Fabian questioned STAND UP CMC’s ability to represent the students as their party is against the document that garnered 94 percent of favorable votes from 7,000 students from last year’s referendum.

STAND UP CMC chairperson aspirant Mikko Ringia quickly countered Fabian’s point.

“Hindi kailangan ng Magna Carta dahil jinu-justify niya ang commercialization ng edukasyon,” Ringia said.

Meanwhile, UP CMC ISA, which has been for the passage of the Magna Carta since its drafting, was asked by a member of the audience on whether they would change their stand on the issue, should students be against it in a referendum.

“Makikinig tayo sa mga estudyante,” said UP CMC ISA chairperson bet Arjay Torno. He added that they will always side with the students.

Voting for SCE begins tomorrow, 8 a.m. Students are required to bring their UP ID or Form 5 in order to cast their vote.

BOTONG ISKO: CSSP SC bets clash over Magna Carta

By Jeuel Barroso

College of Social Sciences and Philosophy Student Council (CSSP SC) bets clashed at the discussion of the students’ Magna Carta in PASABOG, CSSP’s annual SC election debate at the Palma Hall Lobby, Friday.

Drafted by the University of the Philippines (UP) Diliman University Student Council (USC) 2014-2015, the Magna Carta is a codified list of UP students’ rights that cannot be found in any other university document.

While the Magna Carta has yet to be lobbied to the UP administration as of January, the issue remains a hot topic among SC hopefuls.

SALiGAN sa CSSP (SALiGAN) councilor candidate Christopher Kahulugan explained that his party is against the Magna Carta because the document surrenders students’ rights to the Board of Regents (BOR), which, according to SALiGAN, has been proven anti-student throughout the years.

He further stated that the Magna Carta allows the BOR to increase tuition fees and undermines the power of the student movement.

“Napatunayan naman natin… na hindi natin kailangan ng isang codified set of rights para ipaglaban ang ating mga karapatan,” Kahulugan said.

However, BUKLOD CSSP (BUKLOD) Vice Chairperson hopeful Mariel Louisse Cunanan argued against this, citing the board’s power over UP’s tuition fees as long as there is student consultation.

“The BOR has the right to increase our tuition fee,” said Cunanan. “Hindi pinapayagan ng Magna Carta ang tuition fee increase. Almost lahat ng problema natin, natutuunan ng Magna Carta.”

Independent Philosophy Department Representative candidate Kwen Kwen Cabalag also supported the need for the Magna Carta to ensure students’ rights.

“We have to have a legal, concrete document that will ensure our rights as students,” Cabalag said. “It’s not about talking about your rights… we have the right to have this legal document.”

Meanwhile, independent chairperson runner Allyson Maraon stressed that the Magna Carta for Students’ Rights complements the student movement, adding that the fact that a lone student representation in the BOR must be addressed to eliminate the BOR-related contentions against the Magna Carta.

“Patuloy pa rin nating ipaglalaban ang Magna Carta for students’ rights kaakibat ng ating pag-push for more student representation sa BOR,” he said. “Hindi Magna Carta ang end-all, be-all solusyon sa unibersidad.”

Maraon was formerly SALiGAN’s bet for the CSSP SC’s top post before deciding to run an independent bid to forward his stand on the Magna Carta.

During the debate, he clarified that he was given a choice by the CSSP College Student Electoral Board to stay under SALiGAN or revoke his candidacy. Formally, Maraon remains under the party; however, he runs unaffiliated.

Later in the event, Maraon also admitted his mistake in his Facebook post, now deleted, which read that SALiGAN and the Student Alliance for the Advancement of Democratic Rights in UP (STAND UP) imposed on him to go against Magna Carta.

“SALiGAN and STAND UP did not impose anything on me,” he said. “Sinasabi sa statements na nag-impose sila. Mali po ako.”

Maraon also clarified that educational discussions were conducted in the SALiGAN slate and that he was able to express his contentions of being pro-Magna Carta.

Bringing the debate to a college-level discourse, the candidates addressed impending relocation of CSSP organizations’ tambayans, which had been assessed as fire hazards by the Campus Maintenance Office.

BUKLOD councilor aspirant Kristine Kyla De Torres affirmed the rights of UP students to organize and to have their own spaces as per the CSSP SC Constitution, which states that corresponding spaces must be provided to organizations upon their transferring.

De Torres was supported by her slatemate, BUKLOD chairperson candidate Lorenzo Miguel  Relente who added that his party has been forwarding these tambayan guidelines for years along with the CSSP SC.

This was countered by SALiGAN vice chairperson candidate Renz Pasigpasigan, who asked if BUKLOD had consulted CSSP organizations on the demolitions during the previous years.

According to Pasigpasigan, SALiGAN cooperated with the Rise for Education Alliance to write to the CSSP administration to delay the demolition.

“Tayo sa SALiGAN sa CSSP, malinaw sa atin na hindi lang mere document ‘yung ating ginagamit para itaguyod ang ating karapatan, bagkus ‘yung sama-samang pagkilos at pagtindig ng mga konsensya ng bayan para sa ating karapatan sa tambayan,” he said.

BUKLOD’s Cunanan rebutted by saying that the Magna Carta is not a simple document but one that enforces student rights, not just tambayan guidelines.

Independent runner Maraon shared the same sentiment, adding that the Magna Carta can provide students’ tambayan rights.

“Ngunit kaabikat nito [Magna Carta] dapat din nating ipagpatuloy ang kakayahan ng student movement para patuloy na i-assert ang ating karapatan,” he added.

Besides discussing the students’ Magna Carta, the CSSP bets also debated on the Free Higher Education for All Act, the influx of new establishments in UP, as well as government accountability for the homeless occupying idle housing projects at Pandi, Bulacan.

BOTONG ISKO: USC councilor bets debate on free education

By Krysten Mariann Boado and Pathricia Roxas

With the impending responsibility of representing the University of the Philippines (UP) student body, UP Diliman University Student Council (USC) candidates expressed their sentiments on free education at UPFRONT 2017, Thursday.

In the largest USC election forum held at the UP Film Institute, the USC councilor aspirants explained their respective stances on the issue and proposed alternatives to the current state of the country’s education sector.

“Simula’t sapul malinaw ang tindig ng STAND UP (Student Alliance for the Advancement of Democratic Rights in UP) that we are for free education, not just free but also nationalist, scientific, and mass-oriented,” said STAND UP councilor bet Almira Abril.

Abril further rooted the cause of the absence of free education in UP to “neoliberal attacks” such as the Socialized Tuition System (STS), which decides students’ tuition discounts via an online questionnaire.

The system has been in the works since 2011 but was first implemented in the first semester of 2014.

The councilor hopeful also expressed opposition against the Magna Carta for Students’ Rights, which she claimed would only legalize STS.

“Yung mga dating nagsasabi na ang edukasyon ay isang pribilehiyo, biglang nagsasabi na karapatan na raw ang edukasyon,” she said.

“Kailangan maging malinaw ang tindig ng STAND UP; tayo ay para sa libreng edukasyon, para sa lahat, regardless kung may kakayanan kang magbayad o wala,” Abril added.

UP Alyansa ng mga Mag-aaral para sa Panlipunang Katwiran at Kaunlaran (UP ALYANSA) councilor aspirant Cassie Deluria argued against this, however.

“UP ALYANSA has always been for accessible education, and the reason why we say accessible is because we have to remember that even when everybody’s tuition is free, there are still other expenses that will prevent other UP students from coming here to UP,” Deluria said.

She also emphasized that while students deserve free tuition, student leaders must also question its accessibility in terms of transportation, dormitories, books, and other expenses.

The ALYANSA councilor also said their party was part of the Student Council Alliance of the Philippines, the team that drafted the Free Higher Education for All Act.  

“This bill is not yet free education that we deserve,” Deluria said. “And until it is, we are not ready to stop fighting for accessible education for everybody, for every Filipino student.”

The Senate Bill 1304, approved on its final reading by Senate last March 13, aims to provide a tuition-free policy in the country’s 112 state universities and colleges (SUCs) and private higher learning and vocational institutions. However, students can only qualify based on merits, similar to UP’s STS.

Independent councilor candidate Paolo Sevilla also vouched for accessible education, saying that it would be possible if students would not let it turn into a business.

“[Education] should not be commercialized. I believe that we should fight not only for free education, but free basic social services,” he added.

KAISA-Nagkakaisang Iskolar Para sa Pamantasan at Sambayanan councilor runner Arvin Agapay also agreed with Sevilla and said that education should not be a businsses but a right.

Agapay also expressed his party’s support for free education that goes beyond college education.

“Kailangan pati na rin sa primary [at] secondary [level] ay free ang ating education, dahil ang buong education system ang kailangan natin ina-address as an issue,” Agapay said.

Independent councilor hopeful Carlos Cabaero also expressed his support for quality and accessible education; however, he also brought up other sectors in need of funding besides the education sector.

“When we talk about 8.5 billion going towards free education, we also need to think that yes, it gives access to the poor, which is something that we want,” Cabaero said.

“But it also gives funding to people who are rich and people who can pay,” he added.

The aspiring councilor further explained that the every funding that goes to those who can pay “is less funding in ways to improve our educational resources.”

“And that’s why we believe that we need the money to go to the sectors of the people that need it the most,” Cabaero said.

Abril, however, rebutted Cabaero’s statement, saying that free education will not cut the allotment for other sectors.

“Walang matatanggal sa free education. Ang matatanggal lang ay yung kita ng unibersidad na hinuhuthot mula sa bulsa ng bawat isa sa atin,” the STAND UP councilor said.

“Magbibigay siya ng access sa mga anak ng magsasaka, manggagawa, katutubo na hanggang sa kasalukuyang ay hindi nakakatamasa ng edukasyon,” she added.

As for independent councilor aspirant Juan Gonzaga, he believes that every student deserves free education.

“Everybody deserves a right to learn about our futures and everything that we need to equip ourselves for a better future,” said Gonzaga.

Besides free education, the USC bets also discussed other issues such as the General Education reform and the improvement of the registration process in UP, among others.

Meanwhile, Deluria insisted the STS be fixed, despite the system being criticized as “ineffective and a profiteering scheme” by student groups.

“If it’s a question of a system that doesn’t work, then we’re going to work to fix it. If it’s a question of equality inside the university then we can look at reforming taxes outside so it will be equal for everybody,” Deluria said.

Sevilla however, rebutted it saying that free education and having a system which commercializes and turns it into a profiteering scheme do not go together.

“If a system is fundamentally dysfunctional, if a system is fundamentally oppressive, you do not fix it, you remove it,” Sevilla said.

UP falls to UST in three sets, puts Final Four spot on the line

Text by Luisa Morales

Photo by Mark Kevin Reginio

Diliman fans are holding their breaths for the Final Four.

The University of the Philippines (UP) Lady Maroons failed to cement their spot in the Final Four in their first attempt, as they bowed down to the University of Santo Tomas (UST) Tigresses in straight sets, 20-25, 21-25, 16-25, at the Mall of Asia Arena, Sunday.

The game started out tight, with both teams going at it. Neither team was giving up any ground, and the ecstatic crowd was at the edge of their seats with every rally.

It was neck and neck until the second technical timeout with UST up only by a point, 16-15, but the España squad pulled away late in the set with blocks and costly errors from the Lady Maroons to draw first blood, 25-20.

Things looked brighter for State U in the second set. Starting out strong, the Diliman team held a five-point cushion in the middle of the set, 11-6.

However, a barrage of attacks from the Tigresses proved too much for the Lady Maroons. UST dominated the rest of the set to take a 2-0 lead against UP, 25-21.

By the third set, the Maroon squad looked out of steam. Riding on the momentum of their 2-0 lead, UST pounded State U leading at one point by 10.

Despite a mini-run from State U courtesy of veteran Nicole Tiamzon, UST’s lead proved too big to overcome.

The Tigresses eventually won the match, 25-16.

Sophomore Tots Carlos led State U with eight points while Isa Molde and Tiamzon contributed seven markers each.

Ennajie Laure powered UST with 15 points, while skipper Cherry Ann Rondina followed closely behind with 14.

“They [UST] really played well, and it was, again, our errors that killed us,” UP Captain Ayel Estrañero said.

State U ended the match with 26 errors, five more than UST’s 21.

The Lady Maroons are set for a do-or-die match for a Final Four spot against Far Eastern University (FEU) on Wednesday at the FilOil Flying V Arena in San Juan.

“There is no time to be down after this game. Kailangan namin bumawi, kailangan gandahan ang training to gain some confidence going into Wednesday’s game,” the captain said.

Fight for holistic UP education continues for concerned faculty, students

By Nacho Domingo

In condemnation of the University Council’s (UC) approval of the General Elective (GE) reform, the Sagip GE Alliance, composed of faculty and students opposing the reduction of minimum required GE units from 45 to 21, held a press conference March 28 at the Palma Hall steps to fight for holistic UP education.

Speakers hailing from different college faculties in UP united in the belief that the GE reform will deny UP students a well-rounded education and instead, will funnel them into employment for international corporations.

“Kailangang pagtibayin pa ang GE program, pagyamanin at di ito mapapayaman sa 21 units,” said UP Professor Vlad Gonzales of Tanggol Wika.

Currently, the university follows the Revised General Education Program (RGEP), which was first implemented in 2012. It requires students to take 15 units each of Arts and Humanities, Social Sciences and Philosophy, and Math, Science and Technology subjects.

According to journalism professor and member of Sagip GE Alliance Danilo Arao, the importance of GE units lies in providing students with a broad skill set, rather than one that only focuses on subjects directly related to the career paths offered by a degree.

“Ang layunin nito ay mapalawak ang ating isipan. Kailangan natin ma-expose sa iba’t ibang disiplina anuman ang ating spesyalisasyon,” said Arao.

On the other hand, Professor Mico Panis of the Industrial Engineering department defended the reduction of units, saying it will allow engineering programs to be completed in four years instead of five.

“In my opinion, this allows us to stay competitive and attractive with other engineering universities,” Panis said in a separate interview.

Panis also said, “[The] GE reform also removes redundancies ng ibang subjects na natuturo na dapat sa K-12,” adding that GE units are not the only ones to be reduced but also major and cognate subjects.

In contrast, Arao believes that part of what Sagip GE calls “Tatak UP” is how the program develops students’ critical thinking and interrelational skills.

Despite many of the students branding these subjects as unnecessary and a burden to enlist, he said, Arao believes in the values that these develop in the students.

“Ang kailangan lang natin tandaan nung nangyari noong March 20. Nagwagi ang pro-21 proposal para bawasan itong sinasabi nating hybrid general education program,” Arao said.

This was in reference to the poll held among UP professors on March 27. During this meeting,  302 members of voted for, 31 voted against, and 41 abstained the implementation of the reform.

He also said the votes in favor of the reform coming from the Colleges of Science and Engineering played a big hand in its approval, as they account for over 46 percent of the UP student population.

Nevertheless, Arao believes that despite the decision, the fight for a well-rounded education is still ongoing.

“Tuloy-tuloy ang laban, at sa kasaysayan ng Unibersidad ng Pilipinas, malaki ang posibilidad na marereverse ang mga desisyon lalo na’t mayroong malinaw na public pressure mula sa estudyante at alumni,” added Arao.

Meanwhile, USC Chairperson Bryle Leaño described the reform as a neoliberal attack on education that continues to exploit the students.

“Sabi pa nga ni Chancellor Michael Tan na tayo ay narerestructure ng GE reform upang matapos ang ating pag-aaral sa Unibersidad ng Pilipinas,” said Leaño.

“Tayo ay matutulak na maghanap ng trabaho sa mga malalaking korporasyon hindi man sa loob ng Pilipinas kundi sa labas.”

Leaño then described how GE program’s restructuring does not suit the needs of a country like the Philippines, which is heavier on agriculture than science and engineering fields.

He concluded his speech by stating the importance of instilling an educational program that suits the needs of the country.

“Dapat alamin natin kung ano ba ang pangangailangan ng Pilipinas upang tunay na mailapat natin ang ating kagalingan at tunay na magspecialize tayo para sa sambayanan,” said Leaño.

The official approval of the GE reform will take place in a Board of Regents meeting at Quezon Hall on April 5.

Along with progressive student groups, Sagip GE has called for another mobilization to take place in protest of the reform’s implementation.